TY - JOUR
T1 - Using Time-Driven Activity-Based Costing to Identify Best Practices in Academic Libraries
AU - Siguenza-Guzman, Lorena
AU - Auquilla, Andres
AU - Van den Abbeele, Alexandra
AU - Cattrysse, Dirk
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 Elsevier Inc.
PY - 2016/5/1
Y1 - 2016/5/1
N2 - In the current competitive and dynamic environment, libraries must remain agile and flexible, as well as open to new ideas and ways of working. Based on a comparative case study of two academic libraries in Belgium, this research study investigates the opportunities of using Time-Driven Activity-Based Costing (TDABC) to benchmark library processes. To this end, two major research questions are addressed: 1) Can TDABC be used to enhance process benchmarking in libraries? 2) Do results at activity level provide additional insights compared to macro results in a process benchmarking? We first start by describing the TDABC implementation. Then, we discuss and compare the workflow of 10 library processes covering the four principal library functions: acquisition, cataloging, circulation and document delivery. Next, based on the benchmarking exercise, we report and discuss potential processes and performance improvements that can be realized from using library time and costs information, in particular concerning the two libraries analyzed. We conclude this article by discussing the advantages of using TDABC as a tool to enhance process benchmarking in libraries
AB - In the current competitive and dynamic environment, libraries must remain agile and flexible, as well as open to new ideas and ways of working. Based on a comparative case study of two academic libraries in Belgium, this research study investigates the opportunities of using Time-Driven Activity-Based Costing (TDABC) to benchmark library processes. To this end, two major research questions are addressed: 1) Can TDABC be used to enhance process benchmarking in libraries? 2) Do results at activity level provide additional insights compared to macro results in a process benchmarking? We first start by describing the TDABC implementation. Then, we discuss and compare the workflow of 10 library processes covering the four principal library functions: acquisition, cataloging, circulation and document delivery. Next, based on the benchmarking exercise, we report and discuss potential processes and performance improvements that can be realized from using library time and costs information, in particular concerning the two libraries analyzed. We conclude this article by discussing the advantages of using TDABC as a tool to enhance process benchmarking in libraries
KW - Academic libraries
KW - Best practices
KW - Process benchmarking
KW - Time-driven activity-based costing
KW - Time-driven benchmarking
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84964944619
U2 - 10.1016/j.acalib.2016.01.005
DO - 10.1016/j.acalib.2016.01.005
M3 - Artículo
AN - SCOPUS:84964944619
SN - 0099-1333
VL - 42
SP - 232
EP - 246
JO - Journal of Academic Librarianship
JF - Journal of Academic Librarianship
IS - 3
ER -