TY - JOUR
T1 - The right to decide
T2 - A triad of participation in politicizing extractive governance in Latin America
AU - Vela-Almeida, Diana
AU - Gonzalez, Adrian
AU - Gavilán, Iracema
AU - Fenner Sánchez, Gabriela M.
AU - Torres, Nataly
AU - Ysunza, Valeria
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021
PY - 2022/3
Y1 - 2022/3
N2 - This article introduces a triad of participation as an explanatory framework that places more emphasis on the distinction between participation, decision-making and consent in politicizing extractive governance in three Latin American countries. To explore this issue, we consider the institutional mechanisms of participation from above expressed in the legislation of Mexico, Ecuador and Peru, as well as diverse experiences of community resistance against extractive projects in the same countries. Our analysis illustrates that state decision-making and stewardship over strategic and non-renewable natural resources remains unchallenged although participatory mechanisms are assumed as instruments for affected communities to shape decision-making over extractive projects. Our findings also indicate that large mobilizations, legal actions, calls for binding consultation, and forms of blockades are used to successfully shape decision-making. Whilst these actions from below obtain certain achievements, they are only temporarily successful as long-term decisions surrounding extractive governance and underlying structural inequalities remain unaffected. Though actors resisting extractive projects are possibly aware of this limited effect in the short-term, we suggest that their mobilization could create a path for questioning political participation outside the existing structural constraints for questioning established social orders and building emancipatory tools.
AB - This article introduces a triad of participation as an explanatory framework that places more emphasis on the distinction between participation, decision-making and consent in politicizing extractive governance in three Latin American countries. To explore this issue, we consider the institutional mechanisms of participation from above expressed in the legislation of Mexico, Ecuador and Peru, as well as diverse experiences of community resistance against extractive projects in the same countries. Our analysis illustrates that state decision-making and stewardship over strategic and non-renewable natural resources remains unchallenged although participatory mechanisms are assumed as instruments for affected communities to shape decision-making over extractive projects. Our findings also indicate that large mobilizations, legal actions, calls for binding consultation, and forms of blockades are used to successfully shape decision-making. Whilst these actions from below obtain certain achievements, they are only temporarily successful as long-term decisions surrounding extractive governance and underlying structural inequalities remain unaffected. Though actors resisting extractive projects are possibly aware of this limited effect in the short-term, we suggest that their mobilization could create a path for questioning political participation outside the existing structural constraints for questioning established social orders and building emancipatory tools.
KW - Consent
KW - Decision-making
KW - Extractivism
KW - Latin America
KW - Participation
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85100525367
U2 - 10.1016/j.exis.2021.01.010
DO - 10.1016/j.exis.2021.01.010
M3 - Artículo
AN - SCOPUS:85100525367
SN - 2214-790X
VL - 9
JO - Extractive Industries and Society
JF - Extractive Industries and Society
M1 - 100875
ER -