Ir directamente a la navegación principal Ir directamente a la búsqueda Ir directamente al contenido principal

The psychology of offensive and defensive intergroup violence: Preregistered insights from 58 countries

  • Jonas R. Kunst
  • , Tomasz Besta
  • , Michał Jaśkiewicz
  • , Anna Natalia Gajda
  • , Markus Sanden
  • , Mina Marie Flatebø
  • , Sulaiman Olanrewaju Adebayo
  • , Marios Adonis
  • , Collins Badu Agyemang
  • , Raymond Agyenim Boateng
  • , Serap Arslan Akfirat
  • , Samir Al-Adawi
  • , Chiara Ambrosio
  • , Gulnaz Anjum
  • , John Jamir Benzon R. Aruta
  • , Ivars Austers
  • , Oumar Barry
  • , Brock Bastian
  • , Maja Becker
  • , Michael Bender
  • Nora Cornelia Glerud Benningstad, Islam Borinca, Göksu Celikkol, Jiří Čeněk, Trawin Chaleeraktrakoon, Phatthanakit Chobthamkit, Hoon Seok Choi, Suyeong Choi, Patricia Ciordas, Ann Cathrin Coenen, Aleksandra Cupta, Piyanjali de Zoysa, Sandesh Dhakal, Lauren E. Duncan, Tuğçenaz Elcil, Barkan Eskiili, Edgardo Etchezahar, Renata Franc, Silvia Galdi, Magdalena Garvanova, Paul Gill, Augusto Gnisci, Angel Gómez, Talía Gómez Yepes, Igor Grossmann, Emily A. Haines, Fatjona Haka, Boaz Hameiri, Imaduddin Hamzah, Mai Helmy, Roland Imhoff, Shanmukh Kamble, Fiona Kazarovytska, Anna Kende, Narine Khachatryan, Sasha Y. Kimel, Jack W. Klein, Adam Komisarof, David Lacko, Timo Juhani Lajunen, Barbara Lášticová, Claudio López-Calle, Wilson López-López, Barbara Kalebić Maglica, Romualdas Malinauskas, Sona Manusyan, Khatuna Martskvishvili, Gustave Adolphe Messanga, Marta Miklikowska, Jelena Minic, Tamara Mohorić, Francesca Mottola, Silvana Mula, Pasquale Musso, Dieynaba Gabrielle Ndiaye, Félix Neto, Joana Neto, Laina Ngom Dieng, Ihuoma Faith Obioma, Tosin Tunrayo Olonisakin, Simon Ozer, Penny Panagiotopoulou, Beata Pastwa-Wojciechowska, Vassilis Pavlopoulos, Tomislav Pavlović, Inha Petrovska, Andrzej Piotrowski, Xenia Daniela Poslon, Lotte Pummerer, Mahima Raina, Jano Ramos-Diaz, Vilja Robertsson, Bettina Rottweiler, David L. Sam, Rosa Scardigno, Marion K. Schulmeyer, Anna Stefaniak, Anna Studzinska, Mark J.M. Sullman, Marcin Szulc, Willy Taffo Nemboué, Ergyul Tair, Nicole Tausch, Narendra Singh Thagunna, Emma F. Thomas, Joaquín Ungaretti, Colette Van Laar, Žermēna Vazne, Alexandra Vázquez, Jose Villanueva-Alvarado, Anna Wlodarczyk, Kumar Yogeeswaran, Milan Obaidi
  • BI Norwegian Business School
  • University of Gdańsk
  • University of Oslo
  • Ekiti State University
  • University of Nicosia
  • University of Ghana
  • Hong Kong Polytechnic University
  • Dokuz Eylul University
  • Sultan Qaboos University
  • University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli
  • University of Limerick
  • De La Salle University-Manila
  • University of Latvia
  • Université Cheikh Anta Diop de Dakar
  • University of Melbourne
  • Université de Toulouse
  • Tilburg University
  • University of Groningen
  • Mendel University in Brno
  • Thammasat University
  • Sungkyunkwan University
  • University of Waterloo
  • Eötvös Loránd University
  • University of Colombo
  • Tribhuvan University
  • Smith College
  • Gedik University
  • Universidad Autónoma de Madrid
  • Ivo Pilar Institute of Social Sciences
  • University of Library Studies and Information Technologies
  • University College London
  • National Distance Education University
  • University of Johannesburg
  • Flinders University
  • University of Tirana
  • Tel Aviv University
  • Politeknik Pengayoman Indonesia
  • Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz
  • Karnatak University
  • Yerevan State University
  • California State University San Marcos
  • Chinese University of Hong Kong
  • Keio University
  • Czech Academy of Sciences
  • Norwegian University of Science and Technology
  • University of Helsinki
  • Slovak Academy of Sciences
  • Universidad Javeriana
  • University of Rijeka
  • Lithuanian Sports University
  • Ivane Javakhishvili Tbilisi State University
  • Université de Dschang
  • Institute for Globally Distributed Open Research and Education (IGDORE)
  • Linnaeus University
  • University of Priština (North Mitrovica)
  • University of Cagliari
  • University of Bari
  • University of Porto
  • Portucalense University Infante D. Henrique
  • Goethe University Frankfurt
  • Hamburg University of Applied Sciences
  • North West University
  • Aarhus University
  • University of Patras
  • National and Kapodistrian University of Athens
  • Ivan Franko National University of L'viv
  • University of Bremen
  • Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur
  • Universidad Privada del Norte
  • University of Gothenburg
  • University of Nebraska Omaha
  • University of Bergen
  • Universidad Privada de Santa Cruz de la Sierra
  • University of St Andrews
  • Icam School of Engineering
  • Bulgarian Academy of Sciences
  • KU Leuven
  • Riga Stradins University
  • Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
  • Universidad Católica del Norte
  • University of Canterbury
  • University of Copenhagen

Producción científica: Contribución a una revistaArtículorevisión exhaustiva

2 Citas (Scopus)

Resumen

Evolutionary theory and historical evidence suggest humans possess distinct psychological tendencies for defensive and offensive violence, which have insufficiently been considered in research. In a large-scale preregistered study across 58 countries (N = 18,128), we demonstrate that violent extremist intentions manifest along two distinct psychological phenomena: defensive extremism, motivated by protecting one’s group from (perceived) threats, and offensive extremism, driven by establishing group dominance. We show that these dimensions a) can be reliably differentiated across diverse cultural contexts, b) are distinctively associated with psychological dispositions, and c) systematically differentiate countries varying in macrolevel sociopolitical functioning and violence. Across nations, a two-factorial structure was observed that was invariant at the scalar level. Defensive extremist intentions were consistently higher than offensive extremism in 56 out of 58 countries, suggesting greater moral acceptance of protective violence. While psychopathy was positively related to both types of violent extremist intentions, those high in Machiavellianism and narcissism demonstrated particularly higher levels of defensive extremist intentions. By contrast, those scoring high on religious fundamentalism and social dominance orientation demonstrated particularly higher levels of offensive extremist intentions. Unexpectedly, liberal political group identification was associated with higher offensive but lower defensive extremist intentions. Crucially, offensive (but not defensive) intentions were associated with macrolevel societal dysfunction, including political terror and internal conflict. These findings establish that defensive and offensive violent extremist intentions represent two conceptually different forms of extremism across a large and diverse range of countries, with consequences for research and practice.

Idioma originalInglés
Número de artículoe2535665123
PublicaciónProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
Volumen123
N.º13
DOI
EstadoPublicada - 31 mar. 2026

Huella

Profundice en los temas de investigación de 'The psychology of offensive and defensive intergroup violence: Preregistered insights from 58 countries'. En conjunto forman una huella única.

Citar esto