TY - JOUR
T1 - Relationship between ecuatorian student’s learning styles and academic performance in soil science
AU - Quichimbo Miguitama, Pablo Geovanny
AU - Aguirre de Juana, Ángel Javier
AU - Chérrez Chérrez, Giomara Michelle
AU - Quichimbo Miguitama, Edison Andrés
AU - Vanegas Cabrera, Raúl Alejandro
AU - Jiménez Álvarez, Leticia Salomé
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018, Asociacion Argentina de la Ciencia del Suelo. All rights reserved.
PY - 2018/7
Y1 - 2018/7
N2 - Nowadays, there has been increasing interest in topics related to education on soil science, however, topics about learning on this science have been poorly studied, particularly the relationship between learning styles and academic performance has not yet been addressed in the literature. This study aimed to understand the different student learning styles of soil science and their effect on their academic performance at the career of Agronomy Engineering (University of Cuenca, Ecuador). For this purpose, this case-study research was based on the application of the CHAEA questionnaire in order to identify and relate the learning styles with the academic scores of a group of Ecuadorian students who receive introductory courses on soil science. Results demonstrated a general preference of students towards “pragmatic” and “activist” learning styles. In addition, marked differences by gender are clearly noticeable in terms of learning styles, being men more “pragmatic” than women, while women are more “activist” than men. Additionally, women revealed a tendency to be more “theoretical” and “reflective” than men. At last, our results suggest that academic performance was not influenced by learning styles. However, in students who showed multimodal preferences of learning styles, their academic performance became higher. These results highlighted the relevance that education plans in soil science need to consider the diversity of students in terms on their learning style preferences.
AB - Nowadays, there has been increasing interest in topics related to education on soil science, however, topics about learning on this science have been poorly studied, particularly the relationship between learning styles and academic performance has not yet been addressed in the literature. This study aimed to understand the different student learning styles of soil science and their effect on their academic performance at the career of Agronomy Engineering (University of Cuenca, Ecuador). For this purpose, this case-study research was based on the application of the CHAEA questionnaire in order to identify and relate the learning styles with the academic scores of a group of Ecuadorian students who receive introductory courses on soil science. Results demonstrated a general preference of students towards “pragmatic” and “activist” learning styles. In addition, marked differences by gender are clearly noticeable in terms of learning styles, being men more “pragmatic” than women, while women are more “activist” than men. Additionally, women revealed a tendency to be more “theoretical” and “reflective” than men. At last, our results suggest that academic performance was not influenced by learning styles. However, in students who showed multimodal preferences of learning styles, their academic performance became higher. These results highlighted the relevance that education plans in soil science need to consider the diversity of students in terms on their learning style preferences.
KW - Academic score
KW - Chaea questionnaire
KW - Gender
KW - Soil science education
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85055436204
M3 - Artículo
AN - SCOPUS:85055436204
SN - 0326-3169
VL - 36
SP - 196
EP - 203
JO - Ciencia del Suelo
JF - Ciencia del Suelo
IS - 1
ER -