TY - JOUR
T1 - fusionImage
T2 - An R package for pan-sharpening images in open source software
AU - Cánovas-García, Fulgencio
AU - Pesántez-Cobos, Paúl
AU - Alonso-Sarría, Francisco
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 John Wiley & Sons Ltd
PY - 2020/10/1
Y1 - 2020/10/1
N2 - The objective of this article is to evaluate the performance of three pan-sharpening algorithms (high-pass filter, principal component analysis and Gram–Schmidt) to increase the spatial resolution of five types of multispectral images and to evaluate the results in terms of color, coherence and spatial sharpness, both qualitatively and quantitatively. A secondary objective is to present an implementation of the aforementioned pan-sharpening techniques within the open source software R. From a qualitative point of view, pan-sharpening of images with a high spatial resolution ratio give better results than those whose spatial resolution ratio is 2. According to the quantitative evaluation, there is no pan-sharpening methodology that obtains optimal results simultaneously for all types of images used. The results of the spectral and spatial ERGAS index vary for four out of the five types of images analyzed. The results show that none of the methods implemented in this work can be considered a priori better than the others. At the same time, this work indicates the importance of both qualitative and quantitative assessment.
AB - The objective of this article is to evaluate the performance of three pan-sharpening algorithms (high-pass filter, principal component analysis and Gram–Schmidt) to increase the spatial resolution of five types of multispectral images and to evaluate the results in terms of color, coherence and spatial sharpness, both qualitatively and quantitatively. A secondary objective is to present an implementation of the aforementioned pan-sharpening techniques within the open source software R. From a qualitative point of view, pan-sharpening of images with a high spatial resolution ratio give better results than those whose spatial resolution ratio is 2. According to the quantitative evaluation, there is no pan-sharpening methodology that obtains optimal results simultaneously for all types of images used. The results of the spectral and spatial ERGAS index vary for four out of the five types of images analyzed. The results show that none of the methods implemented in this work can be considered a priori better than the others. At the same time, this work indicates the importance of both qualitative and quantitative assessment.
UR - http://polodelconocimiento.com/ojs/index.php/es/article/view/750
U2 - 10.1111/tgis.12676
DO - 10.1111/tgis.12676
M3 - Artículo
AN - SCOPUS:85091042423
SN - 1361-1682
VL - 24
SP - 1185
EP - 1207
JO - Transactions in GIS
JF - Transactions in GIS
IS - 5
ER -