TY - JOUR
T1 - Forest impact on floods due to extreme rainfall and snowmelt in four Latin American environments 2
T2 - Model analysis
AU - Ramirez Matamoros, Marco Tulio
AU - Bathurst, James C.
AU - Cisneros, Felipe
AU - Iroumé, Andrés
AU - Fallas, Jorge
AU - Iturraspe, Rodolfo
AU - Novillo, Marcelo Gaviño
AU - Urciuolo, Adriana
AU - Birkinshaw, Steve J.
AU - Coello, Cristian
AU - Alvarado Martinez, Andres Omar
AU - Miranda, Miriam
AU - Sarandón, Ramiro
AU - Huber, Anton
PY - 2011/4/11
Y1 - 2011/4/11
N2 - Through a systematic modelling analysis for focus catchments in Costa Rica (131km2), Ecuador (10km2), Chile (0.35km2) and Argentina (12.9km2), the hypothesis is tested that, as the size of the hydrological event increases, the effect of forest cover on the peak discharge becomes less important. For each focus catchment, a 1000-year synthetic rainfall time series was generated, representative of the current climate. This time series was used to run SHETRAN hydrological models for each catchment with two contrasting land use scenarios (generally with and without a forest cover). The corresponding maximum daily discharges for the contrasting scenarios were then compared to show the extent to which the two responses converged as the size of the peak discharge increased. For a given forest catchment discharge there could be a range of larger non-forest catchment discharges, depending on antecedent soil moisture content. The simulations show consistently for the rainfall dominated sites that the width of this range either remains constant or narrows as discharge increases, indicating either relative or absolute convergence of the responses. The pattern is more difficult to distinguish for a snowmelt regime but a relative convergence of response still appears possible. The results therefore support the test hypothesis. However, the pattern is complicated by factors such as catchment scale, soil depth, antecedent moisture content and land management. Forests may also still offer significant flood mitigation benefits for moderate (and more frequent) rainfall events and they protect against soil erosion and sediment transport for a wide range of events.
AB - Through a systematic modelling analysis for focus catchments in Costa Rica (131km2), Ecuador (10km2), Chile (0.35km2) and Argentina (12.9km2), the hypothesis is tested that, as the size of the hydrological event increases, the effect of forest cover on the peak discharge becomes less important. For each focus catchment, a 1000-year synthetic rainfall time series was generated, representative of the current climate. This time series was used to run SHETRAN hydrological models for each catchment with two contrasting land use scenarios (generally with and without a forest cover). The corresponding maximum daily discharges for the contrasting scenarios were then compared to show the extent to which the two responses converged as the size of the peak discharge increased. For a given forest catchment discharge there could be a range of larger non-forest catchment discharges, depending on antecedent soil moisture content. The simulations show consistently for the rainfall dominated sites that the width of this range either remains constant or narrows as discharge increases, indicating either relative or absolute convergence of the responses. The pattern is more difficult to distinguish for a snowmelt regime but a relative convergence of response still appears possible. The results therefore support the test hypothesis. However, the pattern is complicated by factors such as catchment scale, soil depth, antecedent moisture content and land management. Forests may also still offer significant flood mitigation benefits for moderate (and more frequent) rainfall events and they protect against soil erosion and sediment transport for a wide range of events.
KW - Floods
KW - Forest
KW - Hydrological model
KW - Land use change
KW - Latin America
KW - Snowmelt
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/79952817121
U2 - 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.09.001
DO - 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.09.001
M3 - Artículo
AN - SCOPUS:79952817121
SN - 0022-1694
VL - 400
SP - 292
EP - 304
JO - Journal of Hydrology
JF - Journal of Hydrology
IS - 3-4
M1 - 400
ER -