TY - GEN
T1 - Exploratory Study of Physic Informed Deep Learning Applied to a Step-Pool for Different Flow Magnitudes
AU - Cedillo, Sebastián
AU - Sánchez-Cordero, Esteban
AU - Samaniego, Esteban
AU - Alvarado, Andrés
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022, The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - Physical laws governing a certain phenomenon can be included in a deep-learning model within a new paradigm: the so-called physical informed deep learning (PIDL). Physical laws in hydraulics consist of partial differential equations (PDEs) resulting from balance laws. The potential use of PIDL in a step-pool reach having a complex flow and geometric characteristics is tested in this article. The studied morphology belongs to a hydraulic observatory in a mountain river in Ecuador where flow and geometric data are available. The water level profile of PIDL was compared to a stationary one-dimensional HEC-RAS model and water levels measured at three staff gauges in the reach. Saint–Venant equations, geometry data, and boundary conditions were used to implement a PIDL-based model. The chosen PIDL architecture is based on the one with the lowest value for the loss function. The resulting water level profile of the PIDL model does not have instabilities, and according to dimensionless RMSE is slightly less efficient in its predictions than the HEC RAS model. Moreover, the difference between HEC-RAS and PIDL water profile decreases as flow increases.
AB - Physical laws governing a certain phenomenon can be included in a deep-learning model within a new paradigm: the so-called physical informed deep learning (PIDL). Physical laws in hydraulics consist of partial differential equations (PDEs) resulting from balance laws. The potential use of PIDL in a step-pool reach having a complex flow and geometric characteristics is tested in this article. The studied morphology belongs to a hydraulic observatory in a mountain river in Ecuador where flow and geometric data are available. The water level profile of PIDL was compared to a stationary one-dimensional HEC-RAS model and water levels measured at three staff gauges in the reach. Saint–Venant equations, geometry data, and boundary conditions were used to implement a PIDL-based model. The chosen PIDL architecture is based on the one with the lowest value for the loss function. The resulting water level profile of the PIDL model does not have instabilities, and according to dimensionless RMSE is slightly less efficient in its predictions than the HEC RAS model. Moreover, the difference between HEC-RAS and PIDL water profile decreases as flow increases.
KW - Field data
KW - Mountain River
KW - Physics Informed Deep-Learning
KW - Step-pool
UR - https://www.ortodoncia.ws/publicaciones/2020/art-68/
U2 - 10.1007/978-981-16-4126-8_26
DO - 10.1007/978-981-16-4126-8_26
M3 - Contribución a la conferencia
AN - SCOPUS:85116821737
SN - 9789811641251
T3 - Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies
SP - 275
EP - 284
BT - Communication, Smart Technologies and Innovation for Society - Proceedings of CITIS 2021
A2 - Rocha, Álvaro
A2 - López-López, Paulo Carlos
A2 - Salgado-Guerrero, Juan Pablo
PB - Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH
T2 - 7th International Conference on Science, Technology and Innovation for Society, CITIS 2021
Y2 - 26 May 2021 through 28 May 2021
ER -