TY - JOUR
T1 - Evaluating a Novel 3D-Printed Resin for Dental Restorations
T2 - Fracture Resistance of Restorations Fabricated by Digital Press Stereolithography
AU - Abad-Coronel, Cristian
AU - Freire Bonilla, Cinthya
AU - Vidal, Sebastián
AU - Rosero, Fabián
AU - Encalada Abad, Carolina
AU - Mena Córdova, Nancy
AU - Paltán, César A.
AU - Fajardo, Jorge I.
AU - Aliaga, Paulina
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 by the authors.
PY - 2025/9
Y1 - 2025/9
N2 - An in vitro study evaluated the fracture resistance of four CAD/CAM restorative materials: lithium disilicate ceramic (IPS e.max CAD, EM), hybrid ceramic (Vita Enamic, VE), a polymer-based composite (Cerasmart, CS), and a novel 3D-printed resin (Ceramic Crown, CC) fabricated using digital press stereolithography (DPS) technology. Standardized full-coverage crowns were designed and manufactured for each material. All specimens underwent thermocycling and fracture testing using a universal testing machine. EM exhibited the highest fracture resistance (mean: 440.49 N), while VE showed the lowest (173.82 N). CS (265.49 N) and CC (306.76 N) presented intermediate values without statistically significant differences between them. Stereomicroscopic analysis revealed differences in fracture patterns, with IPS e.max CAD showing smooth, brittle fractures, while hybrid and polymer-based materials exhibited tortuous fracture surfaces. These results suggest that DPS technology achieves mechanical performance for Ceramic Crown comparable to that of milled polymer-based composites, while offering production advantages in terms of time efficiency. As one of the first studies to evaluate Ceramic Crown and DPS technology, these findings provide initial insights into their mechanical behavior. However, further studies are required to validate their clinical performance before widespread use can be recommended.
AB - An in vitro study evaluated the fracture resistance of four CAD/CAM restorative materials: lithium disilicate ceramic (IPS e.max CAD, EM), hybrid ceramic (Vita Enamic, VE), a polymer-based composite (Cerasmart, CS), and a novel 3D-printed resin (Ceramic Crown, CC) fabricated using digital press stereolithography (DPS) technology. Standardized full-coverage crowns were designed and manufactured for each material. All specimens underwent thermocycling and fracture testing using a universal testing machine. EM exhibited the highest fracture resistance (mean: 440.49 N), while VE showed the lowest (173.82 N). CS (265.49 N) and CC (306.76 N) presented intermediate values without statistically significant differences between them. Stereomicroscopic analysis revealed differences in fracture patterns, with IPS e.max CAD showing smooth, brittle fractures, while hybrid and polymer-based materials exhibited tortuous fracture surfaces. These results suggest that DPS technology achieves mechanical performance for Ceramic Crown comparable to that of milled polymer-based composites, while offering production advantages in terms of time efficiency. As one of the first studies to evaluate Ceramic Crown and DPS technology, these findings provide initial insights into their mechanical behavior. However, further studies are required to validate their clinical performance before widespread use can be recommended.
KW - 3D printing
KW - CAD/CAM materials
KW - biomechanical testing
KW - dental polymers
KW - digital press stereolithography (DPS)
KW - indirect restoration
KW - Biomechanical testing
KW - CAD/CAM materials
KW - Dental polymers
KW - Digital press stereolithography (DPS)
KW - Indirect restoration
UR - https://polodelconocimiento.com/ojs/index.php/es/article/view/1906
U2 - 10.3390/polym17172322
DO - 10.3390/polym17172322
M3 - Artículo
AN - SCOPUS:105016012146
SN - 2073-4360
VL - 17
SP - 1
EP - 13
JO - Polymers
JF - Polymers
IS - 17
M1 - 2322
ER -