TY - JOUR
T1 - ECG Multilead QT Interval Estimation Using Support Vector Machines
AU - Cuadros, Jhosmary
AU - Dugarte, Nelson
AU - Wong, Sara
AU - Vanegas, Pablo
AU - Morocho, Villie
AU - Medina, Rubén
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 Jhosmary Cuadros et al.
PY - 2019
Y1 - 2019
N2 - This work reports a multilead QT interval measurement algorithm for a high-resolution digital electrocardiograph. The software enables off-line ECG processing including QRS detection as well as an accurate multilead QT interval detection algorithm using support vector machines (SVMs). Two fiducial points (Qini and Tend) are estimated using the SVM algorithm on each incoming beat. This enables segmentation of the current beat for obtaining the P, QRS, and T waves. The QT interval is estimated by updating the QT interval on each lead, considering shifting techniques with respect to a valid beat template. The validation of the QT interval measurement algorithm is attained using the Physionet PTB diagnostic ECG database showing a percent error of 2.60±2.25 msec with respect to the database annotations. The usefulness of this software tool is also tested by considering the analysis of the ECG signals for a group of 60 patients acquired using our digital electrocardiograph. In this case, the validation is performed by comparing the estimated QT interval with respect to the estimation obtained using the Cardiosoft software providing a percent error of 2.49±1.99 msec.
AB - This work reports a multilead QT interval measurement algorithm for a high-resolution digital electrocardiograph. The software enables off-line ECG processing including QRS detection as well as an accurate multilead QT interval detection algorithm using support vector machines (SVMs). Two fiducial points (Qini and Tend) are estimated using the SVM algorithm on each incoming beat. This enables segmentation of the current beat for obtaining the P, QRS, and T waves. The QT interval is estimated by updating the QT interval on each lead, considering shifting techniques with respect to a valid beat template. The validation of the QT interval measurement algorithm is attained using the Physionet PTB diagnostic ECG database showing a percent error of 2.60±2.25 msec with respect to the database annotations. The usefulness of this software tool is also tested by considering the analysis of the ECG signals for a group of 60 patients acquired using our digital electrocardiograph. In this case, the validation is performed by comparing the estimated QT interval with respect to the estimation obtained using the Cardiosoft software providing a percent error of 2.49±1.99 msec.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85065251764
U2 - 10.1155/2019/6371871
DO - 10.1155/2019/6371871
M3 - Artículo
C2 - 31178988
AN - SCOPUS:85065251764
SN - 2040-2295
VL - 2019
JO - Journal of Healthcare Engineering
JF - Journal of Healthcare Engineering
M1 - 6371871
ER -