TY - GEN
T1 - Citizen integration in project prioritization methodologies
AU - López, J.
AU - Pulla, D.
AU - Carvallo, J.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Taylor & Francis Group, London.
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - Expert-led multicriteria methodologies might have significant improvements in terms of relevance and effectiveness when citizen participation is integrated. This inclusion is especially influential regarding urban revitalization projects (URPs) prioritization, which directly affects the conservation of cultural heritage. The objective is to apply an existing multicriteria methodology for URPs’ prioritization in Sígsig, Ecuador and extend it integrating citizen participation. The final methodology uses multiple processes, such as FDM (Fuzzy Delphi Method), ISM (Interpretative Structural Modeling), the integrated phase of CV (Cumulative Voting), and ANP (Analytic Network Process). Results show how citizen integration in these methodologies inherently embeds cultural heritage in the final URP. Conclusions address the importance to integrate participative tools as a way to legitimize urban decision-making processes, along with identifying, strengthening, and preserving intangible heritage, such as traditional craftsmanship, tangible heritage, and archaeological remains.
AB - Expert-led multicriteria methodologies might have significant improvements in terms of relevance and effectiveness when citizen participation is integrated. This inclusion is especially influential regarding urban revitalization projects (URPs) prioritization, which directly affects the conservation of cultural heritage. The objective is to apply an existing multicriteria methodology for URPs’ prioritization in Sígsig, Ecuador and extend it integrating citizen participation. The final methodology uses multiple processes, such as FDM (Fuzzy Delphi Method), ISM (Interpretative Structural Modeling), the integrated phase of CV (Cumulative Voting), and ANP (Analytic Network Process). Results show how citizen integration in these methodologies inherently embeds cultural heritage in the final URP. Conclusions address the importance to integrate participative tools as a way to legitimize urban decision-making processes, along with identifying, strengthening, and preserving intangible heritage, such as traditional craftsmanship, tangible heritage, and archaeological remains.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85117728340
U2 - 10.1201/9781003182016-15
DO - 10.1201/9781003182016-15
M3 - Contribución a la conferencia
AN - SCOPUS:85117728340
T3 - The Future of the Past: Paths towards Participatory Governance for Cultural Heritage - Proceedings of the Future of the Past: Participatory Governance
SP - 118
EP - 124
BT - The Future of the Past
A2 - Garcia, Gabriela
A2 - Vandesande, Aziliz
A2 - Cardoso, Fausto
A2 - Van Balen, Koen
PB - CRC Press/Balkema
T2 - 2020 Future of the Past: Paths towards Participatory Governance for Cultural Heritage
Y2 - 2 December 2020 through 6 December 2020
ER -