Building common understanding: seeking consensus and defining social prescribing across contexts – a collective commentary on a Delphi study

  • Caitlin Muhl
  • , Kate Mulligan
  • , Bogdan Chiva Giurca
  • , Marie J. Polley
  • , Gary Bloch
  • , Sir Sam Everington
  • , Michael Dixon
  • , Isabelle Wachsmuth
  • , Cristiano Figueiredo
  • , Halfdan Thorsø Skjerning
  • , Daniela Rojatz
  • , Yu Da Chen
  • , Miriam L. Heijnders
  • , Carolyn Wallace
  • , Michelle Howarth
  • , Daisuke Watanabe
  • , Marcello Bertotti
  • , Anu Helena Jansson
  • , Susanna Althini
  • , Felix Holzinger
  • Darren Glyn Dooler, Siân Brand, Tim James Anfilogoff, Daisy Fancourt, Michelle L.A. Nelson, Stephanie Tierney, Alison Leitch, Hae Kweun Nam, Kiffer G. Card, Daniel Hayes, Siân Slade, Marie Anne Essam, Gay Anthia Palmer, Vivian Andrea Welch, David Robinson, Laurie Hilsgen, Niall Taylor, Rasmus Østergaard Nielsen, Dragana Vidovic, Emer Maeve McDaid, Louíse Viecili Hoffmeister, Jill Bonehill, Alan Siegel, Alžběta Bártová, Fausto David Acurio Páez, Juan Manuel Mendive, Kerryn Husk, Caitlin Muhl (Autor de Correspondencia)

Producción científica: Contribución a una revistaComentario/Debate

6 Citas (Scopus)

Resumen

Social prescribing has become a global phenomenon. A Delphi study was recently conducted with 48 social prescribing experts from 26 countries to establish global agreement on the definition of social prescribing. We reflect on the use and utility of the outputs of this work, and where we go from here.
Idioma originalInglés
Número de artículo1280
Páginas (desde-hasta)1-6
Número de páginas6
PublicaciónBMC Health Services Research
Volumen24
N.º1
DOI
EstadoPublicada - 24 oct. 2024
Publicado de forma externa

Palabras clave

  • Commentary
  • Global definition
  • Social prescribing

Citar esto