TY - JOUR
T1 - Barriers and Advantages of Self-Sampling Tests, for HPV Diagnosis
T2 - A Qualitative Field Experience Before Implementation in a Rural Community in Ecuador
AU - Vega Crespo, Bernardo José
AU - Neira, Vivian Alejandra
AU - Maldonado Rengel, Ruth
AU - López, Diana
AU - Delgado López, Dayanara
AU - Guerra Astudillo, Gabriela
AU - Verhoeven, Veronique
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 Vega-Crespo et al.
PY - 2024/5
Y1 - 2024/5
N2 - Introduction: Cervical cancer screening has demonstrated high efficacy in reducing cervical cancer mortality worldwide. However, clinician sampling is often perceived as an uncomfortable procedure that could reduce screening uptake. Self-sampling methods for HPV diagnosis have shown high sensitivity, which could increase acceptance and screening rates among women. Purpose: This study aims to identify the perceived barriers and advantages of self-sampling methods versus clinician sampling for cervical cancer screening in a rural setting in Ecuador. Patients and Methods: A qualitative study was conducted. Seven focus group discussions took place in the rural Parish of El Valle in Azuay Province, Cuenca, Ecuador. Women native to this rural area were included in the study. FGDs were recorded and transcribed, and content analysis was performed to categorize and analyze the data. Results: A total of 45 women participated in the study. Clinician sampling was perceived as a painful and intrusive method. However, participants believed that it is more reliable compared to self-sampling methods, attributing this to the direct visualization of the cervix, which facilitates the detection of cervical pathologies. The perceived advantages of self-sampling included increased comfort, pain reduction, time savings, the ability to perform the test at home, and the potential for widespread availability through pharmacies or local traditional healers. Nevertheless, doubts about the test’s reliability as well as the user’s proficiency in self-testing posed barriers to the adoption of this technique. Conclusion: Self-sampling methods offer several advantages over clinician sampling, such as enhanced privacy, comfort, and accessibility to cancer screening. Barriers primarily revolved around users’ proficiency in performing the test and the reliability of the results. Providing training for using self-sampling tests could address these barriers.
AB - Introduction: Cervical cancer screening has demonstrated high efficacy in reducing cervical cancer mortality worldwide. However, clinician sampling is often perceived as an uncomfortable procedure that could reduce screening uptake. Self-sampling methods for HPV diagnosis have shown high sensitivity, which could increase acceptance and screening rates among women. Purpose: This study aims to identify the perceived barriers and advantages of self-sampling methods versus clinician sampling for cervical cancer screening in a rural setting in Ecuador. Patients and Methods: A qualitative study was conducted. Seven focus group discussions took place in the rural Parish of El Valle in Azuay Province, Cuenca, Ecuador. Women native to this rural area were included in the study. FGDs were recorded and transcribed, and content analysis was performed to categorize and analyze the data. Results: A total of 45 women participated in the study. Clinician sampling was perceived as a painful and intrusive method. However, participants believed that it is more reliable compared to self-sampling methods, attributing this to the direct visualization of the cervix, which facilitates the detection of cervical pathologies. The perceived advantages of self-sampling included increased comfort, pain reduction, time savings, the ability to perform the test at home, and the potential for widespread availability through pharmacies or local traditional healers. Nevertheless, doubts about the test’s reliability as well as the user’s proficiency in self-testing posed barriers to the adoption of this technique. Conclusion: Self-sampling methods offer several advantages over clinician sampling, such as enhanced privacy, comfort, and accessibility to cancer screening. Barriers primarily revolved around users’ proficiency in performing the test and the reliability of the results. Providing training for using self-sampling tests could address these barriers.
KW - acceptance
KW - barriers and facilitators
KW - cervical cancer
KW - self-sampling
KW - Acceptance
KW - Barriers and facilitators
KW - Cervical cancer
KW - Self-sampling
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85195487763
U2 - 10.2147/IJWH.S455118
DO - 10.2147/IJWH.S455118
M3 - Artículo
AN - SCOPUS:85195487763
SN - 1179-1411
VL - 16
SP - 947
EP - 960
JO - International Journal of Women's Health
JF - International Journal of Women's Health
ER -