Abstract
In this paper a comparison between biosorption membrane technology and the elimination of Pb +2 and Cd +2 wastewater from the mining industry is performed. SEPA cell membranes CF II laboratory scale operations that allows cross-flow filtration with reverse ósmosis membranes (SE, GE Osmonics) and nanofiltration (DK, GE Osmonics), yielding a ratio of ósmosis rejection of 98,77 for Pb +2 is used and 98.30 for Cd + 2 and nanofiltration 98,67 for Pb + 2 and 98.05 for Cd +2 . Powered by biosorption using sugar cane bagasse removal percentages for 97.76 and 81.35 Pb +2 for Cd +2 are obtained. From the environmental point of view the two technologies are compatible with the environment and from the economic point of view, the membranes have a higher initial cost than biosorption process but life is about 10 years, Biosorption you can take advantage of agricultural waste with low acquisition cost.
| Translated title of the contribution | Biosorption technologies and membranes in the removal of heavy metals |
|---|---|
| Original language | Spanish |
| Pages (from-to) | 91-102 |
| Number of pages | 12 |
| Journal | Tecnologia y Ciencias del Agua |
| Volume | 9 |
| Issue number | 6 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 1 Nov 2018 |
| Externally published | Yes |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 6 Clean Water and Sanitation
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Biosorption technologies and membranes in the removal of heavy metals'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver