Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Platelet Transfusion Practices in the ICU: A Prospective Multicenter Cohort Study

  • InPUT Study Group
  • Academic Medical Center of University of Amsterdam
  • Monash University
  • Amsterdam UMC
  • Erasmus University Rotterdam
  • Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile
  • IRCCS Istituto Clinico Humanitas - Rozzano (Milano)
  • Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Therapy
  • Johannes Kepler University Linz
  • University of Groningen
  • Asgar Ali Hospital
  • Université libre de Bruxelles
  • University of Zagreb
  • Charles University
  • University of Copenhagen
  • Hospital Vicente Corral Moscoso
  • Interbalkan Medical Center
  • National and Kapodistrian University of Athens
  • Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences
  • Tata Memorial Hospital
  • University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli
  • University of Tripoli
  • University of Opole
  • Santa Maria da Feira
  • Aga Khan University
  • Military Medical Academy
  • University of Ljubljana
  • Hospital Universitario Dr. Peset
  • Hospital Universitario La Paz
  • Karolinska Institutet
  • University of Bern
  • University of Health Sciences
  • University of New Mexico
  • University of Oxford
  • Utrecht University
  • Université de Bretagne Occidentale

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: There is a lack of comprehensive international data regarding platelet transfusion practices in the ICU. This study aimed to evaluate the current occurrence rate of platelet transfusion in the ICU and provide an overview of platelet transfusion practices including indications for a platelet transfusion, thresholds, (non-)adherence and geo-economic region variations. DESIGN: International prospective cohort study. SETTING: Two hundred thirty-three centers in 30 countries worldwide. PATIENTS: All patients 18 years old and older, admitted to the ICU during a single study week, selected by each site from one of the 16 predefined weeks (March 2019 to October 2022), were included.None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Of the 3643 patients, 208 (6%) received a platelet transfusion during their ICU stay and main indications consisted of active bleeding (42%, n = 187/443), prophylaxis (33%, n = 144/443) or an upcoming procedure (12%, n = 51/443). The median platelet count before transfusion was 44 × 10 9 /L (interquartile range [IQR], 20-78) with variation by indication, including a higher median of 60 × 10 9 /L (IQR 31-93) during active bleeding. A threshold for transfusion was stated in 51% ( n = 224/443) of the events, with a median threshold platelet count of 50 × 10 9 /L (IQR, 40-100). The advised threshold was not adhered to in 16% ( n = 36/224) of cases, with the majority having active bleeding as indication. Contrasts in transfusion practices were observed across different geo-economic regions. Platelet transfusions were administered to 6% ( n = 156/2520) of patients in high-income countries, 5% ( n = 52/1069) of patients in upper-middle-income countries and in none from lower-middle-income countries ( n = 0/54). Non-adherence was higher in the high-income countries (23%, n = 34/149) than upper-middle-income countries (3%, n = 2/75). CONCLUSIONS: Platelet transfusions were administered to a small proportion of critically ill patients, and were given to treat active bleeding or as prophylaxis in the majority of cases. Occurence rate, indication and threshold adherence for platelet transfusion widely varied between geo-economic regions.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-14
Number of pages14
JournalCritical Care Medicine
Volume53
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Dec 2025
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • intensive care unit
  • platelet
  • thresholds
  • thrombocytopenia
  • transfusion

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Platelet Transfusion Practices in the ICU: A Prospective Multicenter Cohort Study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this