Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Los derechos de la naturaleza en la jurisprudencia de la Corte Constitucional Ecuatoriana. Reconocimiento y evolución histórica

Translated title of the contribution: The Rights of Nature in the Case Law of the Ecuadorian Constitutional Court: Recognition and Historical Evolution

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Scopus citations

Abstract

Since 2008, Ecuador has constitutionally recognized Nature as a rights holder; however, the Constitutional Court has played a preponderant role in elabora-ting its content in a constitutional State of rights and justice such as the Ecuadorian one. The article studies the historical evolution of constitutional case law in this matter. The research critically studied the main judgments using three variables: heritage forests, water bodies, and wildlife. The paper presents the main results, emphasizing the cases of Bosque Protector Los Cedros, due to the use of the principle of prevention for the recognition of the rights of Nature, and Estrellita, in which the recognition of wild animals as rights holders was discussed. The article concludes that, despite the progress in the elaboration of the content of these rights, it is necessary that academia, professional as-sociations, and lawyers in free practice fully understand it comprehensively and do not try to benefit from isolated paragraphs of the judgments, causing uncertainties and erroneous interpretations, under the pretext of the protection of the rights of Nature.

Translated title of the contributionThe Rights of Nature in the Case Law of the Ecuadorian Constitutional Court: Recognition and Historical Evolution
Original languageSpanish
Article numbere32117
JournalDikaion
Volume32
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 27 Jan 2023
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Rights of Nature in the Case Law of the Ecuadorian Constitutional Court: Recognition and Historical Evolution'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this