Abstract
This article compares public–private partnerships dedicated to improving forestry management to protect water in the Paute River basin in Ecuador (FONAPA) and the Verde River basin in Arizona (the Four Forest Restoration Initiative). Both programmes create incentives for improved forestry management and suggest lessons for water management in general but may face legal challenges that require reforms. While there is scope for mutual learning between the programmes, such cross-fertilization is inhibited by differences in the legal status of water and forest resources in the two systems.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 337-353 |
| Number of pages | 17 |
| Journal | Water International |
| Volume | 44 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 3 Apr 2019 |
| Externally published | Yes |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 6 Clean Water and Sanitation
-
SDG 15 Life on Land
Keywords
- Arizona
- comparative law
- Ecuador
- forestry management
- Water governance
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Forestry management and water law: comparing Ecuador and Arizona'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver