TY - JOUR
T1 - Ficciones disidentes reescriben la ley
T2 - investigación a través del arte sobre biopolítica, derechos de las mujeres y justicia reproductiva en Ecuador
AU - Galarza Neira, María Teresa
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020, Universidad Andina Simon Olivar, Sede Ecuador. All rights reserved.
PY - 2020/1/1
Y1 - 2020/1/1
N2 - This text is an introduction to my doctoral creative research2 that addresses issues of women’s rights and reproductive justice in Ecuador and Latin America, through the practice of the screenplay writing. The basic research questions that allow me to articulate this reflection are: is it possible to set on legal grounds a fictional story about women’s reproductive rights, in order to propose a political argumentation about women’s fundamental rights and reproductive justice issues in Ecuador and Latin America? If it is, could that fiction in anyway question and contest the legislation in force in order to re-right the rights law disregarded? Through a feature-length screenplay and accompanying dissertation, artistic practice-led research interrogates several international human rights instruments, Constitutional law, Criminal Law and public policy in Ecuador, with regards to women’s reproductive rights. The screenplay is the outcome of a particular sort of juridical hermeneutics; where the heuristic force Paul Ricœur recognizes in fiction allows the screenplay writer to re-present various juridical fictions regarding reproductive rights, shaped according to the Ecuadorian law, in the form of four female characters. The research proposes a biopolitical trajectory in order to interrogate life as possibility, potentiality, and a female body as Bare Life. Dissenting fictions re-righting law renders visible how Ecuadorian law and its biopolitical enforcement strategies disenfranchise women. It ultimately introduces dissensus, as suggested by Jacques Rancière, as a tactic to re-right those rights law disregarded.
AB - This text is an introduction to my doctoral creative research2 that addresses issues of women’s rights and reproductive justice in Ecuador and Latin America, through the practice of the screenplay writing. The basic research questions that allow me to articulate this reflection are: is it possible to set on legal grounds a fictional story about women’s reproductive rights, in order to propose a political argumentation about women’s fundamental rights and reproductive justice issues in Ecuador and Latin America? If it is, could that fiction in anyway question and contest the legislation in force in order to re-right the rights law disregarded? Through a feature-length screenplay and accompanying dissertation, artistic practice-led research interrogates several international human rights instruments, Constitutional law, Criminal Law and public policy in Ecuador, with regards to women’s reproductive rights. The screenplay is the outcome of a particular sort of juridical hermeneutics; where the heuristic force Paul Ricœur recognizes in fiction allows the screenplay writer to re-present various juridical fictions regarding reproductive rights, shaped according to the Ecuadorian law, in the form of four female characters. The research proposes a biopolitical trajectory in order to interrogate life as possibility, potentiality, and a female body as Bare Life. Dissenting fictions re-righting law renders visible how Ecuadorian law and its biopolitical enforcement strategies disenfranchise women. It ultimately introduces dissensus, as suggested by Jacques Rancière, as a tactic to re-right those rights law disregarded.
KW - abortion
KW - artistic research
KW - biopolitics
KW - creative research
KW - practice-based research
KW - reproductive justice
KW - reproductive rights
KW - women’s rights
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85194550947
U2 - 10.32719/26312484.2020.33.9
DO - 10.32719/26312484.2020.33.9
M3 - Artículo
AN - SCOPUS:85194550947
SN - 1390-2466
VL - 2020
SP - 175
EP - 195
JO - Foro: Revista de Derecho
JF - Foro: Revista de Derecho
IS - 33
ER -