Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Evaluation of two QRS detection algorithm on ECG stress test database

  • J. Fajardo
  • , D. Astudillo
  • , K. Palacio-Baus
  • , L. Solano-Quinde
  • , Sara Wong
  • Universidad de Cuenca
  • Prometeo Project Researcher

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionpeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

In this paper, we evaluated two well-known QRS algorithms: Pan & Tompkins (PT) and based wavelet transform (WT) on an ECG stress test database. In the absence of an annotated ECG stress test database, the first stage of this work consisted of the database annotation, using RR-time series obtained from an eight leads stress database (DICARDIA). First, the system proposes to users a lead (reference channel) according to its statistical measures. Then the user realizes a visual inspection aimed at validating or denying the channel proposed by the system. As the series contains few artifacts, the annotation is performed using interval of annotations. Preliminary results realized over 31928 beats provide a sensibility of 99.81% and 98.28% respectively for PT and WT. The procedure developed in this work can be seen as a valuable starting point in semiautomatic annotation of large electrocardiographic databases, as well to evaluate and to improve stress ECG delineations.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationProceedings of the 2016 IEEE ANDESCON, ANDESCON 2016
PublisherInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
ISBN (Electronic)9781509025312
DOIs
StatePublished - 27 Jan 2017
Event2016 IEEE ANDESCON, ANDESCON 2016 - Arequipa, Peru
Duration: 19 Oct 201621 Oct 2016

Publication series

NameProceedings of the 2016 IEEE ANDESCON, ANDESCON 2016

Conference

Conference2016 IEEE ANDESCON, ANDESCON 2016
Country/TerritoryPeru
CityArequipa
Period19/10/1621/10/16

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Evaluation of two QRS detection algorithm on ECG stress test database'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this