Abstract
Urban rivers promote habitats, support ecosystems, and provide human access to water, but also face contamination, especially due to inadequate wastewater treatment. The Ecuadorian constitution of 2008 expanded environmental rights to include rights of nature. We analyse the judicial decision on the River Monjas in Quito, Ecuador in which rights of rivers were articulated through an anthropocentric lens that links rights to the city with rights of nature, including rights to a healthy environment, water, heritage, and sustainability. However, by focusing responsibility soley on the city, the Monjas case was limited in its ability to promote a broader ecosystem framework.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 604-621 |
| Number of pages | 18 |
| Journal | Water International |
| Volume | 50 |
| Issue number | 6 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 2025 |
| Externally published | Yes |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 1 No Poverty
-
SDG 6 Clean Water and Sanitation
-
SDG 11 Sustainable Cities and Communities
-
SDG 17 Partnerships for the Goals
Keywords
- community well-being
- doctrine of public trust
- Ecuador
- municipal responsibility
- right to the city
- Rights of nature
- rivers
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Courts, rights of rivers and the city: insights from Ecuador'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver