Comparative Study of the Influence of Heat Treatment on Fracture Resistance of Different Ceramic Materials Used for CAD/CAM Systems

Andrea Dolores  Ordóñez Balladares; Cristian Gustavo Abad Coronel; Joao Carlos Ramos; Jorge I. Fajardo; Cesar A. Paltán; Benjamín José Martín Biedma

doi:10.3390/ma17061246

Comparative Study of the Influence of Heat Treatment on Fracture Resistance of Different Ceramic Materials Used for CAD/CAM Systems

Andrea Dolores Ordóñez Balladares (First Author)
, Cristian Gustavo Abad Coronel (Corresponding Author)
, Joao Carlos Ramos
, Jorge I. Fajardo
, Cesar A. Paltán
, Benjamín José Martín Biedma (Last Author)

Universidad Bolivariana del Ecuador
Universidad de Guayaquil
University of Santiago de Compostela
Universidad San Francisco de Quito
University of Coimbra
Universidad Politécnica Salesiana

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

7 Scopus citations

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare the influence of heat treatment on fracture resistance (FR) of different ceramic materials used for CAD/CAM systems. Methods: Eighty monolithic restorations were designed using the same parameters and milled with a CAD/CAM system (CEREC SW 5.0, PrimeMill, Dentsply-Sirona™, Bensheim, Germany), forming five study groups: Group 1 (n = 10), CEREC Tessera (Dentsply-Sirona™, Bensheim, Germany) crystallized (CCT), Group 2 (n = 10), CEREC Tessera uncrystallized (UCT), Group 3 (n = 20), Emax-CAD (Ivoclar Vivadent, Schaan, Liechtenstein) (CEC), Group 4 (n = 20), Vita Suprinity (Vita Zahnfabrik, Bad Säckingen, Germany) (CVS), and Group 5 (n = 20) Cameo (Aidite, Qinhuangdao, China) (CC). Results: The average FR was similar for CCT, CC, and CEC at above 400 N, while CVS and UCT had the lowest values at 389,677 N and 343,212 N, respectively. Conclusion: Among the three ceramic materials that exhibited an FR above 400 N, CCT was considered the first recommended choice for CAD/CAM systems. This material not only demonstrated the highest FR but also exhibited outstanding consistency in the related measurements without the presence of outliers. Although the CC material showed high FR, its high dispersion revealed inconsistencies in the repetitions, suggesting caution in its use.

Original language	English
Article number	1246
Pages (from-to)	1-13
Number of pages	13
Journal	Materials
Volume	17
Issue number	6
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17061246
State	Published - 8 Mar 2024

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

SDG 9 Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure

Keywords

CAD/CAM materials
ceramics
crystallization
mechanical characterization
properties
thermal influence

Access to Document

10.3390/ma17061246

Cite this

@article{5292323068fc4b2bb422d284ddd401b9,

title = "Comparative Study of the Influence of Heat Treatment on Fracture Resistance of Different Ceramic Materials Used for CAD/CAM Systems",

abstract = "The aim of this study was to compare the influence of heat treatment on fracture resistance (FR) of different ceramic materials used for CAD/CAM systems. Methods: Eighty monolithic restorations were designed using the same parameters and milled with a CAD/CAM system (CEREC SW 5.0, PrimeMill, Dentsply-Sirona{\texttrademark}, Bensheim, Germany), forming five study groups: Group 1 (n = 10), CEREC Tessera (Dentsply-Sirona{\texttrademark}, Bensheim, Germany) crystallized (CCT), Group 2 (n = 10), CEREC Tessera uncrystallized (UCT), Group 3 (n = 20), Emax-CAD (Ivoclar Vivadent, Schaan, Liechtenstein) (CEC), Group 4 (n = 20), Vita Suprinity (Vita Zahnfabrik, Bad S{\"a}ckingen, Germany) (CVS), and Group 5 (n = 20) Cameo (Aidite, Qinhuangdao, China) (CC). Results: The average FR was similar for CCT, CC, and CEC at above 400 N, while CVS and UCT had the lowest values at 389,677 N and 343,212 N, respectively. Conclusion: Among the three ceramic materials that exhibited an FR above 400 N, CCT was considered the first recommended choice for CAD/CAM systems. This material not only demonstrated the highest FR but also exhibited outstanding consistency in the related measurements without the presence of outliers. Although the CC material showed high FR, its high dispersion revealed inconsistencies in the repetitions, suggesting caution in its use.",

keywords = "CAD/CAM materials, ceramics, crystallization, mechanical characterization, properties, thermal influence, Ceramics, Crystallization, Mechanical characterization, CAD/CAM materials, Thermal influence, Properties",

author = "\{Ord{\'o}{\~n}ez Balladares\}, \{Andrea Dolores\} and \{Abad Coronel\}, \{Cristian Gustavo\} and Ramos, \{Joao Carlos\} and Fajardo, \{Jorge I.\} and Palt{\'a}n, \{Cesar A.\} and \{Mart{\'i}n Biedma\}, \{Benjam{\'i}n Jos{\'e}\}",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2024 by the authors.",

year = "2024",

month = mar,

day = "8",

doi = "10.3390/ma17061246",

language = "Ingl{\'e}s",

volume = "17",

pages = "1--13",

journal = "Materials",

issn = "1996-1944",

number = "6",

}

Comparative Study of the Influence of Heat Treatment on Fracture Resistance of Different Ceramic Materials Used for CAD/CAM Systems. / Ordóñez Balladares, Andrea Dolores (First Author); Abad Coronel, Cristian Gustavo (Corresponding Author); Ramos, Joao Carlos et al.
In: Materials, Vol. 17, No. 6, 1246, 08.03.2024, p. 1-13.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparative Study of the Influence of Heat Treatment on Fracture Resistance of Different Ceramic Materials Used for CAD/CAM Systems

AU - Ordóñez Balladares, Andrea Dolores

AU - Abad Coronel, Cristian Gustavo

AU - Ramos, Joao Carlos

AU - Fajardo, Jorge I.

AU - Paltán, Cesar A.

AU - Martín Biedma, Benjamín José

PY - 2024/3/8

Y1 - 2024/3/8

N2 - The aim of this study was to compare the influence of heat treatment on fracture resistance (FR) of different ceramic materials used for CAD/CAM systems. Methods: Eighty monolithic restorations were designed using the same parameters and milled with a CAD/CAM system (CEREC SW 5.0, PrimeMill, Dentsply-Sirona™, Bensheim, Germany), forming five study groups: Group 1 (n = 10), CEREC Tessera (Dentsply-Sirona™, Bensheim, Germany) crystallized (CCT), Group 2 (n = 10), CEREC Tessera uncrystallized (UCT), Group 3 (n = 20), Emax-CAD (Ivoclar Vivadent, Schaan, Liechtenstein) (CEC), Group 4 (n = 20), Vita Suprinity (Vita Zahnfabrik, Bad Säckingen, Germany) (CVS), and Group 5 (n = 20) Cameo (Aidite, Qinhuangdao, China) (CC). Results: The average FR was similar for CCT, CC, and CEC at above 400 N, while CVS and UCT had the lowest values at 389,677 N and 343,212 N, respectively. Conclusion: Among the three ceramic materials that exhibited an FR above 400 N, CCT was considered the first recommended choice for CAD/CAM systems. This material not only demonstrated the highest FR but also exhibited outstanding consistency in the related measurements without the presence of outliers. Although the CC material showed high FR, its high dispersion revealed inconsistencies in the repetitions, suggesting caution in its use.

AB - The aim of this study was to compare the influence of heat treatment on fracture resistance (FR) of different ceramic materials used for CAD/CAM systems. Methods: Eighty monolithic restorations were designed using the same parameters and milled with a CAD/CAM system (CEREC SW 5.0, PrimeMill, Dentsply-Sirona™, Bensheim, Germany), forming five study groups: Group 1 (n = 10), CEREC Tessera (Dentsply-Sirona™, Bensheim, Germany) crystallized (CCT), Group 2 (n = 10), CEREC Tessera uncrystallized (UCT), Group 3 (n = 20), Emax-CAD (Ivoclar Vivadent, Schaan, Liechtenstein) (CEC), Group 4 (n = 20), Vita Suprinity (Vita Zahnfabrik, Bad Säckingen, Germany) (CVS), and Group 5 (n = 20) Cameo (Aidite, Qinhuangdao, China) (CC). Results: The average FR was similar for CCT, CC, and CEC at above 400 N, while CVS and UCT had the lowest values at 389,677 N and 343,212 N, respectively. Conclusion: Among the three ceramic materials that exhibited an FR above 400 N, CCT was considered the first recommended choice for CAD/CAM systems. This material not only demonstrated the highest FR but also exhibited outstanding consistency in the related measurements without the presence of outliers. Although the CC material showed high FR, its high dispersion revealed inconsistencies in the repetitions, suggesting caution in its use.

KW - CAD/CAM materials

KW - ceramics

KW - crystallization

KW - mechanical characterization

KW - properties

KW - thermal influence

KW - Ceramics

KW - Crystallization

KW - Mechanical characterization

KW - CAD/CAM materials

KW - Thermal influence

KW - Properties

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85189102636

UR - https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/17/6/1246

U2 - 10.3390/ma17061246

DO - 10.3390/ma17061246

M3 - Artículo

AN - SCOPUS:85189102636

SN - 1996-1944

VL - 17

SP - 1

EP - 13

JO - Materials

JF - Materials

IS - 6

M1 - 1246

ER -

Comparative Study of the Influence of Heat Treatment on Fracture Resistance of Different Ceramic Materials Used for CAD/CAM Systems

Abstract

UN SDGs

Keywords

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this