Abstract
The possibility of reusing the effluent from Cuena’s wastewater treatment plant WWTP is analyzed through the application of two treatments: conventional physical–chemical (coagulation, flocculation, sedimentation and filtration, and disinfection) and advanced oxidation with a combination of hydrogen peroxide/ozone. The results show that neither treatment method independently resolves all the limitations of the effluent for reuse, especially regarding organic matter, nutrients, and turbidity. Therefore, the compatibility of the quality of the treated water quality is evaluated for three potential reuses such as unrestricted urban use, recreational use with primary contact, and agricultural irrigation, referencing EPA and Ecuadorian TULSMA standards. This study highlights the need to establish a legal and regulatory framework for water reuse in Ecuador to enable decision-makers to implement sustainable water reuse practices and manage scarcity effectively.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 3400 |
| Pages (from-to) | 1-19 |
| Number of pages | 19 |
| Journal | Water (Switzerland) |
| Volume | 16 |
| Issue number | 23 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Dec 2024 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 6 Clean Water and Sanitation
-
SDG 11 Sustainable Cities and Communities
-
SDG 15 Life on Land
-
SDG 17 Partnerships for the Goals
Keywords
- advance oxidation
- conventional treatment
- wastewater reuse
- water quality
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Comparative Analysis of Conventional Treatment and Advanced Oxidation Applied to Effluent from Stabilization Ponds in Terms of Subsequent Reuse of Treated Water'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver